APA Center for Organizational Excellence: Abstract Detail: Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart?

Resources for Employers

Articles & Research Abstracts

Complete Reference

Title

Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart?

Available Online http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/ocp/16/4/468/
Publication Date October 2011
Author Ilona van Beek, Toon W. Taris, and Wilmar B. Schaufeli
Source Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Source Type Journal Article
Summary

This article focuses on the nature, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism and work engagement. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis identified the two as independent constructs. Four types of employees were identified: workaholic employees, engaged employees, engaged workaholics, and nonworkaholic/nonengaged employees. Further analyses showed that employees who were workaholics were driven by controlled motivation, while employees who were engaged were driven by autonomous motivation. Engaged workaholics were driven by both and also spent the most time on work. Engaged workaholics did not experience the highest levels of burnout. Hence, the authors suggest that engagement may buffer the effects of workaholism on employee burnout.

Keywords workaholism, work engagement, controlled motivation, autonomous motivation
Reference

van Beek, I., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 468-482.

"As a result of our focus on creating a good working environment, ARUP has enjoyed high morale and productivity, low turnover and absenteeism, enhanced recruitment and retention, and positive customer relations."

Carl R. Kjeldsberg, M.D.
CEO and Chairmain of the Board
ARUP Laboratories, Past Winner, Utah